On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Nagy Gabor <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a minor comment on pacman --print: > pacman -Q --print is the same as pacman -Qp, so the result of "pacman > -Qi evince --print" is 'error: package "evince" not found', because > pacman searches for 'evince' package file. Clearly, it is stupid to use > --print with -Q, but pacman shows that option with -Qh. > > I think we should not show "--print" with all -h operations, this is > needless with (not yet implemented) -Dh, too. Then I think we can > forget about my minor comment above. >
You are right. A patch would be very nice.
