On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 18:18 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > Looks good now, except for one other mistake that I've fixed already > locally but I should point out to you- the patch doesn't even compile. > :) You tried treating a list pointer as a package object directly > rather than get the data pointer off of it first.
Oops, sorry about that :S. Next time I'll try to test it myself. > Please always add "Signed-off-by" lines as well, I've also done that > this time for you (but just this once). Thanks! Ok, I wasn't aware of that, will do next time. Jonathan
