On 05/05/10 at 18:31:22 CEST, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
8*?) Tidy up bash_completion stuff? (FS#16630)
The poster disappeared and he tried to sneak a license change in
there, so that just hit a bit of a roadblock. I'd like to improve
this
so I might just sit down and hack at it myself.
"Tried to sneak a license change"?
From your own ml:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Andres Perera <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Dan McGee <[email protected]>
wrote:
Is this strictly necessary? You are changing one piece of code in
the
entire codebase to require v3 or later and as weird as it sounds, I
am
not going to let that fly. I won't be merging this unless it is v2
or
you give some darn good reasons why we should move to v3.
Not really necessary. You can change it to v2, or I can do that if
it
requires a commit from me.
Nah that's good enough for me. I'll try to give this whole thing a
workout in the next day or two and see if I can come up with anything
else that we might want to tweak, however.
-Dan
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04127.html
Maybe I was a little harsh?
Anyway, I don't care if you put a random bash script I wrote ages ago
under GPL, Public Domain, BSD...
lol,
Andres P
