On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Xavier Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> In fact, thinking about this more. Bash-4.1 was released on 2010-01-03 so >>> it will have been out for ~6 months before the next pacman release. Anyone >>> upgrading their package manager from 3.3 -> 3.4 will upgrade bash from 4.0 >>> -> 4.1 so this is probably a non-issue. >>> >>> So I will accept this patch when the comment above and "stray" ! is removed >>> with it. >> >> You are assuming Arch users only here; has Cygwin and OS X moved from >> bash 3.X to 4.X yet? I'd rather not break this just for the sake of >> getting this patch in. >> >> -Dan >> >> > > Damn I knew there was some mails I meant to reply and forgot about. > > If it's that easy to remain compatibility with bash 3, better keep it that > way. > IMO it's fine to drop support for bash 3 as soon as it becomes a > burden and we have a good reason for requiring bash 4. But that does > not seem to be the case for now. > >
I'm kinda lost here ;) How does it break compat with bash 4? -- Andres P
