On 03.06.2010 20:59, Dan McGee wrote: > Not really sure what the right answer is, but what is the reasoning > not to use something like `basename` here? Obviously this is a bit > faster but there is a utility for this that must have some practical > purpose.
Well, it was decided against basename back in October[1] and there is only one basename call left in makepkg. So I just stuck to this decision to use bash instead. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-October/009757.html
