On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > > The previous patches were not much commented. I believe the main problem was > the fact that I didn't use gpgme (and, instead, undone some work already > done). > > So, I changed the code to use gpgme. Here are the patches for your evaluation.
Hi, Now that ArchCon has ended, I believe we can continue with the discussion, right? The replies are rare, so I don't know if there is not enough interest or if my implementation is so bad that can't be fixed :) I am open to any constructive criticism and suggestions, as always. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto -------------------------------------------
