On 2011/2/7 Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Rémy Oudompheng > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am willing to release a 2.8.1 version of namcap corresponding to the >> namcap-2.x branch of the repository. It includes the following >> changes: >> * revert a dictatorial choice of valid filename characters to include >> all reasonable ASCII characters >> * fix the emptydir rule that did not work >> * the extravars rule was never run (and didn't know options was a >> standard variable) >> * an even bigger test suite. >> >> The rules with no test cases are : depends, elffiles, kdeprograms, >> licensepkg, lotsofdocs, missingbackups, perllocal, rpath, >> scrollkeeper, symlink. > Looks like you didn't push the 2.8 tag to the official repo yet. But > 2.8.1 sounds fine. > > I've also noticed you are breaking git commit message convention a > bit- you should have a one line summary, then a blank line, then your > message. See > http://projects.archlinux.org/namcap.git/commit/?id=eb13cb04c7a2bc3264c63e6fa882633a0a54e773 > for why it looks odd doing it the way you have a few times.
I guess it's too late to correct this unless I arbitrarily completely rewrite the branch. I'll try to pay attention to that later. I think I did git push --all instead of git push --tags. That would explain the absence of the tag in the central repository. -- Rémy.
