On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello pacman team! > > I've been following development for quite some time, and would like > to submit my package signing patches for review. >
Out of curiosity, what do these patches accomplish exactly ? > However, since some of the files are entirely new, they would have > a license header. I would like to know under what license should I > release my work. > > I bring this up because during this time I overlooked the inclusion > of the rankmirrors script, which I've now noticed to be GPL v3 code. > > Should my files be GPL v2 or v3? > Why don't you use the same header that all C files in pacman have, which is "gpl v2 or later" ?
