On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Ray Kohler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean >>>>> splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the >>>>> "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string >>>>> damage as possible. >>>> >>>> Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, >>>> repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and >>>> avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here. >>>> >>> >>> I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove. >> >> -d and -f? If you remove an entry, the whole darn thing goes, >> regardless of whether there are deltas or files ...files in there. > > That's what checking the code bears out to me as well, but I think > Allan's point is that -s and -v actually do apply to repo-remove. > > While reading through this code, I noticed what looks like a bug - > when using repo-remove to remove the very last package ("zip up some > emptyness"), the repo won't be signed even if -s was given. Want me to > fix that once I'm done with the usage message?
Yes, it would make sense to do that. Thanks for the QA you're giving this. -Dan
