On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > Please report any issues you may find with this package, as it is > getting very close to being an actual releasable version. These are > debug builds with symbols, so getting stack traces and helpful logging > should be relatively straight forward if necessary.
I'm using it in a daily basis and it is very good! I just have one issue with pacman-key. I'm using --lsign-key to sign keys locally, so gpg trusts them for validating signatures. But pacman-key is confirming the process without asking me. It just feeds 'y's to gpg, so it signs the keys without I having the chance of doing manual validation of fingerprints. I think pacman-key should just let gpg handle the process, showing information about the key and asking if I agree with that. For example, if one uses --edit-key to sign keys, a manual confirmation is needed to get a key signed. Do you agree? I can send a patch, if that's the case. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------
