On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:50:51AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 03/07/12 10:22, Dan McGee wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:02:03AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > >>> On 03/07/12 09:45, Dave Reisner wrote: > >>>> Hook up a per-repo 'Disabled' flag in the config for users to mark repos > >>>> as disabled. This can take a boolean value such as 'yes', 'true', or > >>>> '1', or the similar negated 'no', 'false', or '0'. > >>> > >>> Why do we need this complexity? Why not just specifying "Disabled" > >>> disables the repo and not specifying does not... > >>> > >> > >> We may not. Dan brought up the idea of making this a bit more granular, > >> but I don't have my IRC logs to recall exactly what was mentioned... he > >> can weigh in here. > > > > Given that we have no key-only options under repos, I'm leaning > > against having those be introduced. I've never been a fan of them in > > the [options] section either. > > OK. But do we really need all of True/Yes/1 etc. I just find that > confusing compared to a single "Disabled" flag. > > How about: > Usage = All (default) > Usage = Search Install Update > > > Allan >
I think I like this. /me starts a new branch...
