On 03/04/13 at 05:45am, Allan McRae wrote: > On 04/03/13 05:43, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 01/03/13 04:06, Olivier Brunel wrote: > >> During a sysupgrade, if a package is replaced by another, and an update > >> for the > >> former package is found (on another repo) the replaced package would be > >> re-installed. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Olivier Brunel <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> I'm not really familiar with inner workings of ALPM, so this is probably > >> not the > >> best way to do this. > >> <snip> > >> diff --git a/test/pacman/tests/sync1104.py b/test/pacman/tests/sync1104.py > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..5cec98a > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/test/pacman/tests/sync1104.py > >> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > >> +self.description = "Don't update (reinstall) a replaced package" > >> + > >> +lp = pmpkg("old", "1-1") > >> +self.addpkg2db("local", lp) > >> + > >> +p1 = pmpkg("new") > >> +p1.provides = ["old"] > >> +p1.replaces = ["old"] > >> +self.addpkg2db("sync1", p1) > >> + > >> +p2 = pmpkg("old", "1-2") > >> +self.addpkg2db("sync2", p2) > >> + > >> +self.args = "-Su" > >> + > >> +self.addrule("PACMAN_RETCODE=0") > >> +self.addrule("!PKG_EXIST=old") > >> +self.addrule("PKG_EXIST=new") > >> > > > > Forgot to add - awesome for adding a pactest here!
Is the test case correct though? Other than the fact that this one uses two sync repos, this looks identical to sync132 which has the opposite result. apg
