Dave Reisner <[email protected]> on Tue, 2013/03/05 10:31: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:19:13PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote: > > Simon Gomizelj <[email protected]> on Mon, 2013/03/04 17:49: > > > I believe I addressed all the criticisms thus far. > > > > > > I'll just share this instead of spamming the mailing list with yet > > > another patchset. > > > > > > https://github.com/vodik/pacman/compare/5770425...master > > > > Tested your patches, works really well so far. > > > > I would like pacman to color the actions it performs. Messages printed by > > pre_*() and post_*() functions would be a lot more visible then. > > > > The attached patch is just a "quick and dirty proof of concept. > > I'm not really in favor of doing this. We're already labelling output in > the log file which makes it stand out quite well on its own. I don't > think we need to do this as well on terminal output.
Ah, did not notice that... Really nice!
(I would still see it highlighted on the terminal, but I am happy that way,
too. ;)
--
main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/* Chris get my mail address: */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig */b/42*2-3)*42);}
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
