On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 06:08:10PM -0400, Jason St. John wrote: > On Apr 24, 2013 1:15 AM, "Allan McRae" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 23/04/13 17:15, William Giokas wrote: > > > Originally from Jason St. John's patch, This is a much simplified > > > version explaining some basic functions the four vcs's makepkg supports > > > can use to get package version information. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: William Giokas <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > > There were a number of other formatting/typo? fixes in that patch that > > were good to go. I guess I can edit it just to include those bits if > > Jason does not resubmit. > > > > I can resubmit the patch later tonight. Should I base the patch on > William's? Or should I just resubmit my original patch with the bad parts > removed?
I think that would be good. If you could just split it up into multiple parts and submit a few patches at a time, that would be best. (I'm no good with asciidoc, to be honest, so I'll leave it to people that know) Thanks, -- William Giokas | KaiSforza GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF
pgp_dvhgZ7r_5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
