On 07/05/13 23:48, Dan McGee wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 29/04/13 12:00, Eric Bélanger wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> doc/makepkg.8.txt | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/doc/makepkg.8.txt b/doc/makepkg.8.txt >>>> index bb7a9a3..53a7867 100644 >>>> --- a/doc/makepkg.8.txt >>>> +++ b/doc/makepkg.8.txt >>>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Synopsis >>>> Description >>>> ----------- >>>> 'makepkg' is a script to automate the building of packages. The >>> requirements for >>>> -using the script are a build-capable \*nix platform and a custom build >>> script >>>> +using the script are a build-capable *nix platform and a custom build >>> script >>>> for each package you wish to build (known as a PKGBUILD). See >>>> linkman:PKGBUILD[5] for details on creating your own build scripts. >>>> >>> >>> Hrm... did this used to be needed? I see it was added in with its >>> original commit in 2007 so it may just have been an oversight. >>> >>> Anyone more familiar with asciidoc than I am want to comment >> >> >> >> Status? I guess that if no-one complained in the past week then it's OK, >> right? Anyhow, it missed the 4.1.1 deadline so there's no hurry. I just >> don't want it to be forgotten. > > I think Asciidoc was stupider before with regards to '*' entering a > bold/emphasis highlighting section. It appears it isn't necessary, so > > Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <[email protected]> >
OK -> maint.
