On 30 May 2013 11:32, William Giokas <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly, this is when I would say to call paccache in your repo-add > function. As there is no separation between pacman and pacman-contrib > anymore, it doesn't need any extra deps. Then things could still be done > in one step while not duplicating code and introducing possible bugs.
Ah, I understand. I thought you meant "just use paccache and forget the patch". Using paccache instead does sound better; I will amend and resubmit. Thanks.
