> What if we just did not print installed optional dependencies? I'm open to that idea, but hesitant to completely remove them. Maybe we can adjust the output of pacman -Si to include this status in the optional dep list? I'd like additional opinions for either of these changes.
Drew DeVault On 07/11/2013 11:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 12/07/13 15:40, Drew DeVault wrote: >>> But that puts the most important uninstalled optdep in the middle of the >>> output. >> I suppose that's true. From my testing, however, it looks fairly >> distinct. Example: >> >> Optional dependencies for cmus >> alsa-lib: for ALSA output plugin support [installed] >> libao: for AO output plugin support [installed] >> libpulse: for PulseAudio output plugin support [installed] >> faad2: for AAC input plugin support [installed] >> flac: for flac input plugin support [installed] >> libmad: for mp3 input plugin support [installed] >> libmodplug: for modplug input plugin support [installed] >> libmp4v2: for mp4 input plugin support [installed] >> libmpcdec: for musepack input plugin support [installed] >> libvorbis: for vorbis input plugin support [installed] >> wavpack: for wavpack input plugin support [installed] >> ffmpeg: for ffmpeg input plugin support >> opusfile: for opus input plugin support >> >> What if we moved [installed] to the start of the line, or added a line >> between the two groups of packages? >> > What if we just did not print installed optional dependencies? > > > >
