On 19/07/13 09:29, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> > +check_pacsave(){
>> > + for f in "${1}" ${1}.[0-9]; do
> Strange that you quoted one of these but not the other. You're hitting
> the same 10+ pacsave problem here, too.
>
> for f in "$1"{,.+([0-9])}
> Question: do we actually care about that? Getting pacsaves with that many suffixes actually takes quite a bit of effort. Allan
