On 07/22/13 at 08:41am, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Jul 22, 2013 2:48 AM, "Andrew Gregory" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <[email protected]> > > --- > > OK... I'll bite. Why? Is this really going to be used elsewhere? Seems like > an error case that should be handled by the like any other.
My goal wasn't reusability so much as visibility. It's an artificial limitation we impose to prevent memory exhaustion in a recursive call, not a true error condition. I also did this with the thought of eventually trying to make the parser usable for pacman-related programs outside of pacman proper and making the limit configurable. I don't know if a macro is the best way to do that, though. apg
