On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/09/13 07:48, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 03/09/13 06:52, Jason St. John wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Ping on this question. >>>> >>>> (and lesson for everyone - the more minimal your changes in a patch, the >>>> more chance it gets accepted quickly...) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Should I resubmit this with the BASENAME change done in a separate >>> patch? Or should I resubmit with each file done in a separate patch? >>> >> >> No need. I believe I got the OK for this on IRC. I will pull this >> patch next time I do some pacman work. >> > > But it would help if you could resend the patch rebased on master. I > am having difficulty applying it and do not have the time to fix it myself. > > A > >
Sure. I resubmitted it here: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2013-September/017780.html Jason
