On 04/09/13 06:15, keenerd wrote: > Splitting up makepkg seems a little silly.
A >3000 line bash script that is virtually impossible to comprehensively test is silly. > This might qualify as "too > simple", but please consider something like this this: > > [ $1 == "--as-lib" ] && return > > You place this between the function definitions and the main body of > the script. When you do a > > source makepkg --as-lib > > then it will load all the functions and bail out before getting to the > main code. > Having a library available is not the point of this. I'd guess very little else is actually going to use it. A
