On 06/11/13 07:50, Dave Reisner wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Ingenieria Informatica <[email protected]> > ----- > >> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 22:40:18 +0100 >> From: Ingenieria Informatica <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] >> Subject: Pacman Config File (SigLevel) >> >> Hello, my name is Hamoud and I have a small question: >> >> According to pacman.conf: >> >> [options] >> >> # By default, pacman accepts packages signed by keys that its local keyring >> # trusts (see pacman-key and its man page), as well as unsigned packages. >> SigLevel = Required TrustedOnly >> LocalFileSigLevel = Required TrustedOnly >> >> I understand from the above that signatures will be required from both >> packages >> & databases AND If a signature is checked, it must be in the keyring and >> fully >> trusted; marginal trust does not meet this criteria. >> >> Is that a valid configuration? because I only want to modify the option >> section >> as a default control of my packages/databases. I need to harden my system as >> much as possible specially with signature check (paranoid mode hehe) >> >> Thank you very much in advance. :) >>
Please do not send support emails directly to us. You are better asking on public mailing lists and forums if you expect answers. As to your question "Is that a valid configuration?". The answer is yes - perfectly valid. But it will not work on any distribution using pacman that I know of. Allan
