On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:39:51AM +0100, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > > This groundbreaking idea has been proposed and rejected several times > > already. > > > > Can you point me to where they were rejected? I have submitted the > patches implementing this functionality in the past, but they were > rejected because of technical problems, not because of the idea > itself. This new patch series should fix all the issues that were > present in my previous attempts. Also I remember that Allan set > FS#35050 as due in 4.2.0 probably because I was working on it.
Doing shallow clones breaks way too much to be worth it in git: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-April/022938.html I'm just going to say that I am greatly opposed to using --depth=1 in the default source array. If you want --depth=1 you can use the prepare function, but I would still hazard against that because it's quite limiting with what you can do. -- William Giokas | KaiSforza | http://kaictl.net/ GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306 E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF
pgpq5KZm8yG3Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
