Hey, Andrew, sorry for the delay. I can only scrounge up a certain number of cycles for pacman stuff, and those were consumed by my recent Doxygen experiments. In this brief time, after I popped that off my stack, and before I must respond to the inevitable feedback, I turned back to what I promised to meditate on, and I think I have a good question: Isn't it the job of the test framework to expose the candidate binary to different SCRIPTLET_SHELLs and verify that it behaves correctly under each? If that is the case then the --scriptlet-shell arg is just wrong.
- [pacman-dev] [PATCH 0/5] Unit tests for -Qk and -Qkk Jeremy Heiner
- [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add unit tests for -Qk and -Q... Jeremy Heiner
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add unit tests for -Q... Andrew Gregory
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add unit tests fo... Jeremy Heiner
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add unit test... Andrew Gregory
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add unit... Jeremy Heiner
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add unit... Jeremy Heiner
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add ... Allan McRae
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ... Jeremy Heiner
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ... Allan McRae
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ... Jeremy Heiner
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ... Allan McRae
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ... Jeremy Heiner
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ... Allan McRae
- Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 2/5] Add unit tests for -Q... Allan McRae
- [pacman-dev] [PATCH 3/5] Simplify the Python code that... Jeremy Heiner
