On 24/02/15 05:27, David Macek wrote: > On 23. 2. 2015 18:11, Allan McRae wrote: >> I dislike the idea of a non-empty $pkgdir at the start of packaging so >> am not convinced about this yet. > > Just to be sure, do you mean $pkgdir, or $pkgdirbase? My proposition was > retaining ./pkg/whatever-pkg-dirs, but still cleaning ./pkg/current-pkg-dir > before package(). >
I meant $pkgbasedir - I'm stuck back in the old days! >> Why would you not change where the $pkgdir symlink points as part of >> your script that does the needed changes and builds all the package >> variants? > > $pkgdirbase doesn't need to be a symlink, the wrapper script doesn't > currently link anything by itself. Moreover, symlinks are actually disabled > by default in MSYS2 due to various difficulties, and `ln -s` creates copies > instead. > OK - rename the $pkgbasedir directory instead. Or just extract the package tarballs when you want to look at the package files. Allan
