On 17. 3. 2015 23:41, Allan McRae wrote:
> Some packages genuinely need this do to poor build systems.
> 
> $ for i in */*; do unset build; . $i/PKGBUILD; if declare -f build |
> grep -q pkgdir; then echo $i; fi; done | wc -l
> 64
> 
> OK - most of those are in [community] so probably bad packaging.  But is
> there a reason to remove this?

No other reason than to clean up the code and enforce the packaging guidelines. 
If you were to discard this patch, then also disard the second one. I assume 
some recipes use plain `mkdir $pkgdir`, which would be broken by moving 
creation of $pkgdirbase after build().

-- 
David Macek

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to