On 24/12/15 16:04, Jashandeep Sohi wrote: > Yes, I'm aware I could scroll back, look at the log or pipe the output > to a temp file for later analysis, but this feels like a unnecessary > extra step to perform after each update considering these messages are > rare and I'd expect nothing out-of-the-ordinary most of the time. > > But if this has been asked before, there is little point in rehashing > old arguments. Could you point me towards the discussion so I can > understand why it was rejected? > > Thanks, > Jashandeep >
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12861
