On 12/02/16 20:09, Christian Hesse wrote:
When I added this we had early libpng releases with had problems with
ancient broken png files that are still around in some packages. Using
optipng was an easy way to fix this. Space saving was just an extra. ;)
Recently, there was a bug affecting an SVG library in a similar way. [1] Until 
it was fixed, I solved this problem manually converting the image in the 
PKGBUILD. The SVG optimization Allan mentioned could possibly have been an easy 
fix. So I think of them as useful. However, keeping the modules in the main 
pacman repository with no real maintenance also gives the wrong impression.

Throwing away both altogether seems to me like discarding sensible work already 
done. As far as I understand the structure, they could simply be moved out to 
another package. PKGBUILDs using the respective options could then simply 
depend on this package.

So how about posting them to the AUR as "makepkg-optimize", orphaned. This 
would leave the content in a usable state, while clearly showing that it is unsupported 
and without maintainer. From there, any interested developer still using those options 
may even take over.

[1]: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47245

Reply via email to