2016-10-04 10:21 GMT+02:00 Christian Hesse <l...@eworm.de>:

> From: Christian Hesse <m...@eworm.de>
>
> We checked for empty array elements, but did not catch empty array. Add
> a check for that case as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Hesse <m...@eworm.de>
> ---
>  scripts/libmakepkg/lint_pkgbuild/pkgname.sh.in | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/libmakepkg/lint_pkgbuild/pkgname.sh.in
> b/scripts/libmakepkg/lint_pkgbuild/pkgname.sh.in
> index a044082..2696afa 100644
> --- a/scripts/libmakepkg/lint_pkgbuild/pkgname.sh.in
> +++ b/scripts/libmakepkg/lint_pkgbuild/pkgname.sh.in
> @@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ lint_pkgbuild_functions+=('lint_pkgname')
>  lint_pkgname() {
>         local ret=0 i
>
> +       if [[ -z "${pkgname[0]}" ]]; then
> +               error "$(gettext "%s is not allowed to be empty.")"
> "pkgname"
> +               ret=1
> +       fi
> +
>         for i in "${pkgname[@]}"; do
>                 if [[ -z $i ]]; then
>                         error "$(gettext "%s is not allowed to be
> empty.")" "pkgname"
> --
> 2.10.0
>

If pkgname="", this will cause the error message to be printed twice (once
in the added if-statement and once in the loop). Should we just return
immediately instead of setting ret=1?

/Rikard

Reply via email to