On 21/12/17 14:22, Andrew Gregory wrote: > 6cfc4757b98e813428d261dbc185e20618ca83a6 was overzealous in attempting > to optimize away a call to strcmp based on a comparison of hashes. The > call can be skipped if the hashes are different, but different strings > could have the same hash. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregor...@gmail.com> > ---
Good catch! I'm interest if you saw an issue in the wild? A
