From: Ivy Foster <i...@escondida.tk>

Signed-off-by: Ivy Foster <i...@escondida.tk>
---
This verion of the patch simply drops the check for '?', since it's
caught by "default" anyway. The other patches are unchanged, except
where rebased against this modified patch.
 src/pacman/pacman-conf.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/pacman/pacman-conf.c b/src/pacman/pacman-conf.c
index 1e6f55f9..0f81ece6 100644
--- a/src/pacman/pacman-conf.c
+++ b/src/pacman/pacman-conf.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
        int c;
        config_file = CONFFILE;
 
-       const char *short_opts = "";
+       const char *short_opts = "c:hlR:r:Vv";
        struct option long_opts[] = {
                { "config"    , required_argument , NULL , 'c' },
                { "rootdir"   , required_argument , NULL , 'R' },
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
                                cleanup();
                                exit(0);
                                break;
-                       case '?':
                        default:
                                usage(1);
                                break;
-- 
2.16.1

Reply via email to