On 05/31/2018 12:24 PM, Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) wrote: > This causes package_$pkgname() to be preferred over package() in the > non-split case, but the behavior if both functions exist was > undocumented anyway.
We don't document the behavior of arbitrary user-defined functions.
package_$pkgname() is only defined as having meaning in the context of
the PACKAGE SPLITTING section of the documentation.
IMHO this is us documenting that package() is the only correct function
unless ${#pkgname[@]} > 1.
I think it is far more intuitive to behave that way, and I'd actually be
willing to refuse to use package_$pkgname even if it is the only one...
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
