On 09/10/2018 2:15 am, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 9/10/18 11:05 am, morganamilo wrote:
>>  static struct pkg_operations local_pkg_ops = {
>> -    .get_base        = _cache_get_base,
>> -    .get_desc        = _cache_get_desc,
>> -    .get_url         = _cache_get_url,
>> -    .get_builddate   = _cache_get_builddate,
>> -    .get_installdate = _cache_get_installdate,
>> -    .get_packager    = _cache_get_packager,
> <snip>
>> +    .get_base         = _cache_get_base,
>> +    .get_desc         = _cache_get_desc,
>> +    .get_url          = _cache_get_url,
>> +    .get_builddate    = _cache_get_builddate,
>> +    .get_installdate  = _cache_get_installdate,
> ...
> 
> Is there any objection to killing this formatting rather than having a
> lot of uselessness in the patch.
> 
> A
> 

I could split adding the fields and the formatting to two patches if you
prefer? Easier to read diffs and the struct stays pretty.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to