On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 1:27 AM, Andrew Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > What would you consider correct behavior?
I think the simplest changes from current behaviour would be just cosmetic: Failing to prepare for a transaction with --print sounds off. Perhaps just saying dependencies can't be satisfied would be better, though I don't consider this a major problem since it's easy to understand and doesn't stand out very much. The -Rcp example, however, surprised me. I'd consider making the -Rcp example print more like the -Rc example, for one to make it more consistent with -Rp, for two to actually tell the user what the HoldPkgs are. The prompt shouldn't appear, and instead simply say that a HoldPkg was found in the target list.
