On 4/9/20 12:24 pm, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 9/3/20 9:38 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote: >> On 08/21/20 at 08:20pm, Ronan Pigott wrote: >>> From: Ronan Pigott <rpig...@berkeley.edu> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott <rpig...@berkeley.edu> >> >> Sure, I guess. pacman-conf is meant for use in scripts; who on Earth >> is running it in a terminal? > > It can be pretty useful for running without options in order to > copy-paste your pacman.conf for help, but that's again not really a use > case for completions.
I was working on the principle, that if someone submitted them, we can include them. Adds no overhead, beyond keeping them up to date. > I guess we want the same completions in bash_completion.in, but given I > don't really have a good use for it myself, I'm not sure I'll bother > writing it myself... If someone submits, I will include them. If not, I don't care. A
