On 30/11/2020 7:02 pm, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > "if(ret)" is semantically equivalent to "if(ret != 0)". Is the change > really needed here? >
I don't particularity care what format is used, just as long as they're all the same. Comparing against 0 was already used twice in that file so just thought I'd make that one do it too.
