On 17/4/21 1:45 pm, Mark Weiman wrote:
> On Linux, SIGPOLL is a valid signal, but on systems like FreeBSD, it is
> not. This patch does a preprocessor check to see if SIGPOLL is available
> or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Weiman <[email protected]>
> ---
> This is a modified patch where formatting is addressed and the check for
> SIGPOLL is done as a preprocessor macro rather than in meson.
> 
>  lib/libalpm/util.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/libalpm/util.c b/lib/libalpm/util.c
> index 46c1d0a1..1d9d85dd 100644
> --- a/lib/libalpm/util.c
> +++ b/lib/libalpm/util.c
> @@ -558,8 +558,12 @@ static void _alpm_reset_signals(void)
>       int *i, signals[] = {
>               SIGABRT, SIGALRM, SIGBUS, SIGCHLD, SIGCONT, SIGFPE, SIGHUP, 
> SIGILL,
>               SIGINT, SIGKILL, SIGPIPE, SIGQUIT, SIGSEGV, SIGSTOP, SIGTERM, 
> SIGTSTP,
> -             SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU, SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2, SIGPOLL, SIGPROF, SIGSYS, 
> SIGTRAP,
> -             SIGURG, SIGVTALRM, SIGXCPU, SIGXFSZ,
> +             SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU, SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2, SIGPROF, SIGSYS, SIGTRAP, 
> SIGURG,
> +             SIGVTALRM, SIGXCPU, SIGXFSZ,
> +#if defined(SIGPOLL)
> +             /* this is needed for FreeBSD et al. */

This comment made me thing SIGPOLL was a BSD specific signal. I changed
the comment to make the issue more clear:

+               /* Not available on FreeBSD et al. */

> +             SIGPOLL,
> +#endif
>               0
>       };
>       struct sigaction def;
> 

Reply via email to