On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:19 +0000, Philip Potter wrote: > Adam, Peter, thanks for your responses; I feel much clearer and > happier with the situation now. >
Glad to hear it. > On 29 January 2010 09:08, Peter Lavender <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do think though that it would be good to see more traffic for Padre stuff > > hit the list... the only reason I knew of Steffans branch was that I caught > > a breif mention of it in IRC either from a commit or just a simple mention > > of it in passing. > > this++ I won't promise anything, but if I notice something like it again, I'll try to post to the list. I think too that blogging about these sorts of thing is also a desired way of keeping people in the loop and increasing exposure to Padre, but not every one blogs. Adam does a great job when he's got something to say. > > > BTW, are you in Canberra? I seem to recall the name back a while when we > > tried to have a few Perl Monger meetings.. only to find none of the proposed > > dates and times worked for me and I made none of them. > > Nope, I'm in London. GMT+0. Right.. the name I was thinking of was Michael Potter. Pete.
_______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
