-=| Sebastian Willing, Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 12:29:36PM +0200 |=- > Hi, > > The F:H:B license was GPL (which has been ok for everybody until now). > > I just changed it to the perl license (the same which is being used in > Padre) and it should show up on CPAN soon.
I didn't want to sound offensive, sorry.
GPL is fine, what wasn't fine is the way it was applied to the code.
Compare
This program is released under the following license: gpl
to
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
License, or (at your option) any later version.
(taken from the GNU recommendation at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html)
Padre's license is also clear
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the same terms as Perl 5 itself.
Thank you for taking this seriously.
Ah, I see 0.05 on CPAN. You are quick!
The license statement in the POD is allright. Now it is the README
that disagrees with it :) This is not a problem for the Debian package
since your intent is clear from this thread. Fixing it in a future
release would be nice though.
Thanks again!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
