I would say that at least a third of the entire Padre core
distribution (in lines of code terms) has been written on Win32.

That's not to say there aren't a ton of bugs, just that if you see a
problem on Windows it is definitely a bug and not something caused
merely by lack of attention. File tickets against anything you
encounter.

While the deep internals and all the basic functionality should be
pretty reliable, in some cases one particular feature that isn't
commonly used (printing might be a good example) might not have been
testing on Win32.

Again, file tickets and they should get fixed.

Tests that exercise those features are even better, because CPAN
Testers will complain indefinitely into the future.

Of course, test scripts for printing would be rather annoying...
(especially if they printed something)

Adam K

On 25 April 2010 02:09, chm <devel.chm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just updated to v0.60 (win32/strawberry) and
> verified that the REPL plugin still crashes
> Padre: if you load the plugin with the manager,
> enter $a = 1; in the REPL Evaluate widget... BOOM!
>
> * Are there any Padre developers working on win32?
>
> * Do you see the same result or is this something
>   screwy in my installation/configuration?
>
> * Also, I did load a single perl source file.  When
>   I selected File->Print the system printer widget
>   came up but when I hit the Print button, Padre
>   locked up completely.  (At least when the REPL
>   kills Padre I don't have to manually kill the
>   process.  :-)
>
> Apologies for the "stick my head up from the rabbit
> hole" posting but I'm currently working to get all
> the core PDL functionality to work on win32 perls.
> Once that is working, I would like to see PDL
> working with Padre.  Previous list discussions
> with Gabor Szabo with PDL developers suggested
> two directions for PDL+Padre work:
>
> * Integrate the perldl shell on-line help into the
>   Padre help capabilities
>
> * Make a Padre::Plugin::Perldl interface based
>   on the current Padre::Plugin::REPL.
>
> I'm open to suggestions for inching forward with
> the win32 Padre problems.  The fundamental problem
> may be that there are not any win32 Padre developers
> so that platform will continue to lag until some
> appear.
>
> Padre looks very nice and I look forward to using
> and developing for it once it works on my platforms
> of necessity (win32 and cygwin).
>
> I'll post again with PDL on win32 status as things
> happen.  Please let me know if there is any Padre
> progress on the same front.
>
> Thanks much,
> Chris Marshall
> PDL Developer / future Padre Developer...
> _______________________________________________
> Padre-dev mailing list
> Padre-dev@perlide.org
> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to