On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Oliver Trosien <o.tros...@epages.com> wrote:
> Hello Padre-Dev,
>
>
>
> I’d like to say hello and ask for your suggestions to a feature I’m
> discussing
>
> with the developers of Perl::Critic. It is about adding refactoring
> possibilities to
>
> perlcritic [1]. There are many good rules out there and most of them have
>
> an easy fix, which the programmer currently has to code manually.
>
>
>
> As padre has the ambitious goal of refactoring perl, why not take
>
> the chance and create some kind of connection between perlcritic and padre.
>
>
>
> What I’m asking you to do is, join the discussion on cpan and give your
> input,
>
> so the design of the feature will be in a way that’s useable for padre.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>  Oliver
>
>
>
> [1] https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=60801

Thanks for the pointer.

I also think that such refactoring tool should be separate from
Perl::Critic and it should not be totally automatic.
Before each change I'd like to approve/reject it. Maybe fine tune it
before accepting it or telling to tool to inject a
"non-violation" mark of Perl::Critic so it won't complain about it next time.

This tool might need to have some cooperation with the developers of
Perl::Critic as it might need a better API that
what Perl::Critic currently provides but as I am not too familiar with
it I don't really know.

I'd really like to see this integrated into Padre or rather into the
Perl::Critic plugin of Padre.

Gabor
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to