Shlomi,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il> wrote: > On Monday 29 November 2010 17:09:37 Ahmad Zawawi wrote: >> Hi Shlomi, >> >> Could you please provide any links of such a discussion? :) > > This is the closest I found by grepping my mailing lists' archives: > > http://mail.perl.org.il/pipermail/perl/2009-December/010704.html First of all you could have said in your original mail that you are quoting me and not "a core Padre developer". Or did you write that message *before* finding the quote? Second, I don't think I wrote there that "EPIC is recommended". I wrote Eclipse+EPIC is more advanced. As I have not been using Eclipse for a while I don't know in which feature have Padre supassed it and in which features Padre is still lacking. Azawawi, it would be nice if you could give use a comparison. The issues I can see are 1) syntax highlighting for 5.10 2) the debgugger in Padre is still not being very usable. 3) VCS integration 4) Editing via FTP? - I have never used it but as I understand many people do. Does it work well in Padre? Gabor _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
