Indeed, now that Padre is kind of "feature-ful" it's good to concentrate in stability and "paper cuts". And push this version forward as the one to be picked up by distros and the like.
C. On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Sebastian Willing <sebastian.will...@web.de> wrote: > Hi, > > we've been working hard on growing up Padre and decided somewhere in the > 0.50s not to jump to 1.0 but wait until we had enough releases. > > I think we should follow this and if 1.0 is the next release number, it > is, so special treatment. > > Maybe the branch-and-fix period should be (much) longer for 1.0 :-) > > Sebastian > > On 09.07.2011 04:16, Peter Lavender wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Given that the next release will be 0.88, we have effectively 6 more >> 'stable' release before we hit the magic 0.100 or 1.00. >> >> What are peoples thoughts on this. >> >> I know versioning can be a hot topic, and personally I'm not fussed one >> way or another, so there's my "non vote" on the issue. :) >> >> Peter. >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Padre-dev mailing list >> Padre-dev@perlide.org >> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > Padre-dev@perlide.org > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
