On 03/07/12 15:50, Gabor Szabo wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:23 PM, kevin dawson <ke...@dawson10.plus.com> wrote:
On 02/07/12 19:14, Claudio Ramirez wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:07 PM, kevin dawson <ke...@dawson10.plus.com> wrote:
On 01/07/12 09:51, Gabor Szabo wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 9:27 PM, kevin dawson <ke...@dawson10.plus.com> wrote:
4, tested using apache info/status and top
Sorry to take advantage, but it may be a good idea to have a look at
the registration thing now you're looking at trac anyways. Ping me in
the channel if you want to discuss it.
C.
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
hi Claudio
sorry I missed you on #pa...@irc.perl.org
as for registeration, why can't we just enable e-mail varefication
see ->
http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/AccountManagerPlugin/Modules#EmailVerificationModule
it's just one click in web admin, then we could enable forgotten
passwords for alias / adamk :)
Have you tried that?
When I tried it 2 years ago it enforced verification *if* you gave an e-mail.
But did not actually *require* an e-mail.
Gabor
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
are you saying that the info below
This *has been added as a strict requirement now* as suggested by ticket
#5509 <http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/5509> to trunk code with changeset
[9277] <http://trac-hacks.org/changeset/9277>, but was not enforced
before, so verification only happened, if an email had been specified on
registration. In other words, if some user registered w/o specifying an
email address, this was possible and an unrestricted account was created
without requiring further actions.
from previous link is not correct
regards
bowtie
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
