Hi,

On 08/04/2013 22:17, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> This is the class in question.
>
> http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxddeserver.html#wxddeserver
>
> And I stand corrected, this would fix the port problem ONLY on Windows.
>

Hey, if you want wxDDE I'll see if it builds with recent MinGW and add 
it. As it is a 1980's IPC I never really thought it represented a defect.

>     The ideal solution is that WxWindows itself supports the necesary
>     API for doing single instance support "properly" on each platform,
>     but nobody would add that API to the Perl Wx bindings.

Why would no-one add some part of wxWidgets/wxWindows to Wx? I assume 
what you actually mean is that this should be part of Wx and Wx should 
evolve into something more than a wrapper for wxWidgets?. Personally I'm 
of the feeling that I'd only want to commit to maintaining Wx as a 
wrapper around wxWidgets. I think Wx::SomeOtherDeveloper would be a 
great idea for bits that someone wants to add in that aren't part of 
wxWidgets. Then Wx::SomeOtherDeveloper could be just whatever you want 
it to be. I can't see that creating something that isn't part of 
wxWidgets would take any extra effort whatsoever to put in 
Wx::SomeOtherDeveloper and as Wx is a wrapper around wxWidgets something 
that isn't in wxWidgets would not to me seem automatically best placed 
in Wx. Importantly too, I don't see that putting something in 
Wx::SomeOtherDeveloper would add one iota of extra work for the implementer

>     If we have better control over the evolution of Wx than when I was
>     working on Padre actively, by far the best solution is to have it
>     added to Wx.pm and then port to using that instead of my hand-rolled
>     approach.

What sort of control do you envisage? I can't imagine not helping to 
integrate any contributed code in the appropriate package nor helping 
with any request on how to integrate something nor handing over release 
and maintenance of Wx to anyone who wants to do it. I have no interest 
whatsoever in maintaining Wx with the narrow focus of a Padre 
sub-project. However, I have no sense of ownership over Wx so if anyone 
fancies doing something else with it then feel free to offer.

Some code would be nice.

Cheers

Mark






_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to