Assalamu Alaikum W. W.
Iko ado penjelasan tt Ahmadiyah dalam Bahasa Inggris. Kalau lah tahu
tolong diapuih sajo. Iko dapek dari milis tetangga. Rasonyo kito
menyokong fatwa MUI. Mudah2an dapat menambah taqwa kita berdasarkan
Qur'an dan Hadist.
Wassalam
Hayatun Nismah Rumzy
___________________________________________________________
The 1974 Declaration of Muslim World League:
Qadianism or Ahmadiyyat: It is a subversive movement
against Islam and the Muslim world, which falsely and
decietfully claims to be an Islamic sect; who under the
guise of Islam and for the sake of mundane interests
contrives and plans to damage the very foundations of
Islam. Its eminent deviations from the basic Islamic
principles are as follows:
1. Its founder claimed that he was a Prophet.
2. They deliberately distort the meanings of the verses of
the Holy Quran.
3. They decalred that Jehad has been obolished.
Qadianism was originally fostered by the British
imperialism. Hence it has been flourishing under her flag.
This movement has completely been disloyal to and dishonest
in affairs of the Muslim Ummah. Rather, it has been loyal
to Imperialism and Zionism. It has deep associations and
cooperation with the anti Islamic forces and teachings
especially through the following nefarious methods:
1) Construction of mosques with the assistance of the anti
Islamic forces wherin the misleading Qadiani thoughts are
imparted to the people.
2) Opening of schools institutions and orphanages wherein
the people are taught and trained as to how they can be
more anti Islamic in their activities. They also published
the corrupted versions of the Holy Quran in different local
and international languages.
In order to combat these dangers, the Conference recommends
the following measures:
1. All the Muslim organization in the world must keep a
vigilant eye on all the activities of Qadianisin their
respective countries; to confine them all strictly to their
schools, institutions and orphanages only. Moreover he
Muslims of the world be shown the true picture of Qadianism
and be briefed of their various tactics so that the Muslims
of the world be saved from their designs.
2. They must be declared non Muslims and ousted form the
fold of Islam. And be barred to enter the Holy lands.
3. There must be no dealings with the Qadianis. They must
be coycotted socially , economically and culturally Nor
they be married with or to Nor they be allowed to be buried
in the Muslims graveyards. And they be treated like other
non Muslims.
4. All the Muslim countries must impose restrictions on the
activities of the claimant of Prophethood Mirza Ghulam
Ahmed Qadianis followers; must declare them a non Muslim
minority must not etrust them them with any post of
responsibility in any Muslim country.
5. The alterations effected by them in the Holy Quran must
be made public and the people be briefed of them and all
these be prohibited for further publication.
6. All such groups as are deviators from islam must be
treated at par with the Qadianis.
Fatwa of permanent board of Inquiry and Fatwa (Saudi
Arabia):
Question: What is the Islamic ruling (fatwa) about this new
religion Ahmadiyya and its followers?
In addition, when
and where did this religion originate and what is the
Islamic ruling (fatwa) about people who are in its favor?
All Praise to Allah who is The One and Blessings and Peace
be upon his Messenger, his Followers and Companions
To
the Point:
Answer: The Pakistan government has ruled these people
outside the fold of Islam; also, the Muslim World League
(Rabita Aailm-e-Islami) in Mecca has passed a similar
fatwa. In the gathering of the Muslim Scholars (Rabita
Aailm-e-Islami) in the year 1394 A.H. (1974), a written
statement was drafted to explain the true principles of
this group, how and when they started, and so on. Very
briefly, this group has declare that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, an
Indian, is a prophet who has received revelations from
Allah and that no one will be correct in his Islam, unless
he believes in him (Mirza). He (Mirza) was born in the 13th
century, but Allah(SWT) has told us in his Book (Quran)
that prophet Muhammad(SAW) is the last of Prophets1; all
Muslim scholars have given an unanimous ruling that whoever
makes the claim that after him(SAW) there can appear a new
prophet is a Kafir (non-Muslim), because he will be lying
about Allahs Book and about the hadith of the Prophet(SAW)
which states that he(SAW) is the very last of the Prophets.
In addition, this would be contrary to the consensus of the
Muslim Ummah.
With Allah is Success and Peace of Allah be upon his
Messenger Muhammad and his Followers and Companions.
The Permanent Board for Inquiry and Fatwa (Saudia Arabia):
Member Member Vice Chairman Chairman
Abdullah bin Ghaud Abdullah bin Ghedian Abdulrezagh Afifi
Abdulaziz bin Abdullah bin Baz
1: Ahmad: 398/2, 412, 79/3, 248, 81/4, 84, 127, 128, 278/5;
Al-Bukhari: 3535; Muslim: 2286, 2287
Fatawa al-Lajnah ad-Daimah lil-Buhoth al-'Ilmiyah
wal-Ifta., Question 3 of Fatwa No. 1615
Question from the Fatwa No. 4317:
Question: We request your explanation on the Islamic ruling
regarding the Qadiani group, and their self-procalimed
"prophet" Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani. We also request you send us
some books which have researched this group since I am
concerned in studying them.
Answer: The prophethood was completed by our prophet
Muhammad(SAW) so there is no prophet after him, according
to what is confirmed in the Book (Quran) and the Sunnah. So
whoever claims prophethood after this, then he is a liar.
And from amongst these is Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani. So his
claim of prophethood is a lie, and what the Qadianis claim
regarding his prophethood is false.
The judgement of the Council of Senior Scholars of Saudi
Arabia was passed regarding the Qadianis that they are an
unbelieving group because of their ideology.
With Allah is Success and Peace of Allah be upon his
Messenger Muhammad and his Followers and Companions.
The Permanent Board for Inquiry and Fatwa:
Member Member Vice Chairman Chairman
Abdullah bin Ghaud Abdullah bin Ghedian Abdulrezagh Afifi
Abdulaziz bin Abdullah bin Baz
Fatawa al-Lajnah ad-Daimah lil-Buhoth al-'Ilmiyah
wal-Ifta., Volume 2, Page 313, Fatwa No. 4317
The third question from the Fatwa No. 8536:
Question: What is the difference between the Muslims and
the Ahmadis (Qadianis)?
Answer: The difference between the two is:
The Muslims are those who worship Allah alone and follow
His messenger Muhammad(SAW) and believe that he is the seal
of the prophets, and that there is no prophet after him.
As for the Ahmadis, who are followers of Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad, they are kuffar and not Muslims, because they claim
that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a prophet after Muhammad(SAW),
and whoever believes in this ideology then he is an denier
of truth, according to all the scholars of Islam, as
Allah(SWT) says:
"Muhammad is not the father of any man among you, but he is
the Messenger of Allaah and the last (seal) of the
Prophets" [al-Ahzaab, 40].
And because of what has been authenticated on the authority
of the Messenger of Allah(SAW) that he said:
"I am the seal of (all) the prophets, there is no prophet
after me", [Imam Ahmad - volume 2, page 398 and 412, volume
3 page 79 and 248, volume 4, page 81, 84, 127 and 128,
volume 5, page 278; al-Bukhari (Fath al-Bari) number 3535;
Muslim - number 2286 and 2287; Abu Dawud - number 4252].
With Allah is Success and Peace of Allah be upon his
Messenger Muhammad and his Followers and Companions.
The Permanent Board for Inquiry and Fatwa - :
Member Member Vice Chairman Chairman
Abdullah bin Ghaud Abdullah bin Ghedian Abdulrezagh Afifi
Abdulaziz bin Abdullah bin Baz
Fatawa al-Lajnah ad-Daimah lil-Buhoth al-'Ilmiyah
wal-Ifta., Volume 2, Page 314, Question 3 of Fatwa No. 8536
Fatwa of Islamic Fiqh Academy, Egypt:
Question:
Dear scholars, As-Salaam `Alaykum
Would you please shed some light on the Ahmadiyyah or
Qadyaniyyah movement? Jazakum Allah khayran.
Answer:
Wa`alykum As-Salaamu Warahmatullahi Wabarakaatuh.
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and
blessings be upon His Messenger.
Dear sister in Islam, thanks for showing great keenness on
understanding the teachings of your religion and we pray to
Allah to keep us firm on the Straight Path.
As regards the question you posed, we quote for you the
fatwa issued by Islamic Fiqh Academy on Qadyaniyyah, with
slight additions from other sources. It goes as follows:
Definition:
Qadyaniyyah (also known as Ahmadiyyah) is an Indian-based
movement that was established under the patronage of the
British colonial powers in 1900 for the aim of driving
Muslims away from their religion and, most definitely, the
religious duty of Jihad, which, they feared, might be used
to stage rebellion against the British occupation. The
mouthpiece of the movement was Religions, a magazine that
was issued in English at that time.
Dogmas and Ideology:
Ghulam Ahmad, the founder of the movement, began his
activities as an Islamic caller to attract as many
supporters as he could. Later, he claimed himself a
reformer and a divinely-inspired man. Afterwards, he said
that he was the awaited Mahdi. Later on, he claimed
prophethood and even said that his prophethood was much
better than that of Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings
be upon him.
The followers of this group believe that Allah, Glorified
be He, performs some acts befitting the mortals, like
fasting, praying, sleeping, and even committing mistakes.
But Allah Almighty is Far Exalted above what they say!
A Qadyani believes that his lord is English as he speaks to
him in English. He also believes that Muhammad, peace and
blessings be upon him, is not the seal of Prophets and that
Allah Almighty sends new prophets according to time and
need, and that Ghulam Ahmad is the greatest prophet. The
followers of this sect also believe that Angel Gabriel used
to come to Ghulam Ahmad and convey revelations to him. In
addition, they say that the only accepted book is the book
presented by Ghulam Ahmad, his words are the only accepted
words and that all prophets stand under his control.
Furthermore, they believe that their book, known as
Al-Mubeen is a heavenly-revealed one.
They continue spreading their false ideas by saying that
they have a new religion totally different from all other
religions and that the companions of Ghulam Ahmad are like
the Prophets Companions. Moreover, they say that Qadyan,
their leaders place of birth, is like, or even better
than, Makkah and Madinah, so they take it as their prayer
direction and a center of pilgrimage. They call for
ignoring Jihad and showing complete obedience to the
British empire, because it represents the ruler to whom
obedience is due. To them, every Muslim is a Kafir
(disbeliever) until he converts to their belief, and that
anyone who marries a non-Qadyani is considered an
unbeliever. They also allow wine, opium, intoxicants and
drugs.
In 1914 the followers of Ghulam Ahmad were divided into two
groups. The overwhelming majority of his followers belong
to the first group known as Qadyanis and were headed by
Bashiruddin Mahmud, the second successor of Ghulam Ahmad.
The second group known as Lahori, and founded by Muhammad
Ali Lahori, is a minority among the followers of Ghulam
Ahmad. The second group have a less striking tone of their
principles by claiming that they do not believe in Ghulam
Ahmad as a prophet in the real sense of the term but as
Mujaddid (a renovator). However, they still believe him to
be true in all other claims, which led Muslims to regard
them also as outside the pale of Islam.
Qadianiyah in the Eyes of Muslims:
On the month of Rabi` Al-Awwal 1394 A.H. (April 1974 A.C.)
a large conference was held in the Muslim World League
headquarters in Makkah and was attended by many
representatives of international Islamic organizations. The
communiqué issued by this conference branded this group as
Kafirs (unbelievers). It also recommended that all Muslims
should stand to face this group and never deal with its
members and not to bury them in Muslim cemeteries.
Moreover, Qadyaniyyah followers have good relations with
Israel that helped them issue a special magazine (that
stands as their mouthpiece) and many other pamphlets that
are distributed all over the world.
Conclusion:
Based on the above-mentioned facts, we can say that
Qadyaniyyah is a deviant group that has nothing to do with
Islam. Muslims are to be aware of them especially after
they have been branded as Kafirs by all scholars.
For more information, you can read the following:
- Muhammad Iqbal, Islam and Ahmadism, Lahore-Pakistan,
1976.
- Syed Abul Ala Maudoodi, The Qadiani Problem, Karachi,
1956.
- Ehsan Elahi Zaheer, Qadiyaniat: An Analytical Survey,
Lahore-Pakistan, 1976.
- Mahmood A. Ghazi, Qadiani Problem and Position of the
Lahori Group, Islamic Book Foundation, Islamabad, 1991.
- Bashir Ahmad, Ahamadiyya Movement: British Jewish
Connections, Islamabad, 1994.
- Mane`Bin Hammad Al-Juhani, Al-Mawsu`ah Al-Muyassarah fi
Al-Adyan wal Madhahib Al-Mu`asirah.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Fatwa of Islamic Fiqh Council, South Africa:
After discussing the question put to the Islamic Fiqh
Council in Capetown, South Africa, concerning the ruling on
the Qadianis and their off-shoot which is known as
Lahoriyyah, and whether they should be counted as Muslims
or not, and whether a non-Muslim is qualified to examine an
issue of this nature:
In the light of research and documents presented to the
members of the council concerning Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
al-Qadiani, who emerged in India in the last century and to
whom is attributed the Qadiani and Lahori movements, and
after pondering the information presented on these two
groups, and after confirming that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
claimed to be a prophet who received revelation, a claim
which is documented in his own writings and speeches, some
of which he claimed to have received as revelation, a claim
which he propagated all his life and asked people to
believe in, just as it is also well-known that he denied
many other things which are proven to be essential elements
of the religion of Islam
In the light of the above, the Council issued the following
statement:
Firstly: the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a prophet
or a messenger and to receive revelation are clearly a
rejection of proven and essential elements of Islam, which
unequivocally states that Prophethood ended with Muhammad
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and that no
revelation will come to anyone after him. This claim made
by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad makes him and anyone who agrees with
him an apostate who is beyond the pale of Islam. As for the
Lahoriyyah, they are like the Qadianiyyah: the same ruling
of apostasy applies to them despite the fact that they
described Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a shadow and manifestation
of our Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him).
Secondly: it is not appropriate for a non-Muslim court or
judge to give a ruling on who is a Muslim and who is an
apostate, especially when this goes against the consensus
of the scholars and organizations of the Muslim Ummah.
Rulings of this nature are not acceptable unless they are
issued by a Muslim scholar who knows all the requirements
for being considered a Muslim, who knows when a person may
be deemed to have overstepped the mark and become an
apostate, who understands the realities of Islam and kufr,
and who has comprehensive knowledge of what is stated in
the Quraan, Sunnah and scholarly consensus. The ruling of
a court of that nature is invalid. And Allaah knows best.
Majma al-Fiqh al-Islami, p. 13
Fatwa of Dr Muzammil Siqqiqi, USA:
Question:
As-Salamu `Alaykum. What can you tell us about Ahmadis? I
think you can give us some insight into their ideology and
method and what should our attitude be toward their
missionaries.
Answer:
Wa`alaykum As-Salaamu Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.
In The Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and
blessings be upon His Messenger.
Dear questioner, thank you very much for having confidence
in us, and we hope our efforts, which are purely for
Allahs Sake, meet your expectations.
In his response to the question, Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi,
former president of the Islamic Society of North America,
states the following:
Ahmadiyyah is a movement that started in India in the
beginning of the 20th century. The founder of this
movement, Ghulam Ahmed, from the village of Qadiyan in
Punjab, claimed to be the Messenger of Allah.
Because of this claim, the scholars of Islam unanimously
consider him as a non-believer. Some of his followers still
believe that he was the Messenger although they say that he
was not the full Messenger, but a subsidiary Messenger.
They misinterpret the verse of Surat Al-Ahzab where Allah
Almighty says, " Muhammad is not the father of any man
among you, but he is the messenger of Allah and the Seal of
the Prophets; and Allah is Aware of all things." (Al-Ahzab:
40)
They claim that the word Khatam An-nabiyyin doesn't mean
the last Prophet, but the best Prophet.
According to them, Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be
upon him, was the best Prophet, but it is possible to have
lesser or minor Prophets. However, this is obviously a
wrong interpretation because there are many other verses
and Prophetic Hadiths that indicate that Prophet Muhammad,
peace and blessings be upon him, was sent as a Prophet of
Allah for all people, and there are many authentic Hadiths,
of which the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said
that there would be no Prophet after him.
So Ahmadi's have rejected a basic principle of Islamic
faith and because of this, they are not considered Muslims.
Among them, there is a group that says that Ghulam Ahmad
was not a Prophet, but that he was the Messiah or the Madhi
or things like that.
However, that is also obviously wrong because the Messiah
and the Mahdi will come at the end of the world and the end
of the world has not come yet, so that shows that this
claim was a false claim.
The Ahmadi missionaries succeed because they are organized
and they spread their message all over the world while many
of us are lazy and we don't present the authentic message
of Islam with the same vigor and enthusiasm. Thus, instead
of getting into arguments with Ahmadis or any other group,
let us concentrate on presenting the authentic message of
Islam and Insha Allah, the truth will prevail."
May Allah guide you to the straight path, and guide you to
that which pleases Him, Amen.
Allah Almighty knows best.
Fatwa of Shariah Council, UK:
Question:
There has been a local dispute in which a Muslim community
has prevented a Qadiani women from burying her husband in a
Muslim cemetery. Given that Qadianis are consensually
agreed to be outside the fold mainstream of Islam, is this
a reasonable stance to take or is religious bigotry?
Answer:
This is not religious bigotry. We do not have an
excommunicating authority in Islam but we do have a set of
beliefs which are indisputable. Anybody calling into
question these beliefs is considered a Murtadd (an
apostate). The finality of Prophethood is established in
the Qur'an in Chapter 33 where Allah says that Muhammad was
not the father of any man among you, but he is the
Messenger of God and the seal of all the Prophets. The
Prophet, peace be upon him, himself confirmed this when he
said, "I am the last of all the Prophets. There will be no
more after me." Thus the finality of Prophethood is an act
of faith to which every Muslim must submit.
Those who dispute this belief with arguments, even though
they may be couched in Islamic terms, have been declared as
non-Muslims by all the scholars and research academies. As
such they have no right whatsoever to be buried in a Muslim
cemetery.
This is not bigotry. It is part of the Islamic way of life
in which only Muslims should be buried in an Islamic
cemetery to the extent that where a non-Muslim woman is
married to a Muslim man and she passes away during
pregnancy she is not to be buried in a Jewish or Christian
cemetery because she is conceiving a Muslim child. Nor is
she to be buried in a Muslim cemetery because she herself
is not a Muslim. She has to be interred somewhere neutral.
(31 - Jana'iz 2)
15th November 1996
Shaykh Syed Mutawalli ad-Darsh
Faqih from Al-Azhar, Cairo
Chairman of the UK Shari'ah Council
Fatwa of Mufti Ebrahim Desai, South Africa:
Question:
How should we act toward the Ahmadis or (Qadianis) people
who are in Pakistan also, and they belive that Imam
mehdi(A) has come to the world? I wanted to know how to
treat these people? Now that the government in Afghanistan
is western backed, I noticed these people also trying to
come for their tabligh to Afghanistan and the dificulty is
that these people act like muslims and they try to spread
in Afghanistan too, so how could we take steps towards them
and I want you to please inform as many muslims as possible
about these people and that they could go to Afghanistan to
take every step to stop them. may Allah give you the reward
wasalaam
Answer:
Qadianis are not Muslims.
It is incumbent upon every individual to inform his
associates about Qadianis and every possible effort should
be made to protect and safeguard innocent people from the
net of Qadianis.
and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best
Mufti Ebrahim Desai FATWA DEPT.
Fatwa of Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
Question:
I appeal to you to answer the questions that I have
previously submitted or to answer the one that follows, as
the problem has for months caused me nothing but trouble in
my local community. Even if I had the support of a fatwa,
it might not help because this local community does not
respect the ulama, but at least I would know that I am not
erring.
I know that you cannot answer all questions, but surely
something as important as this cannot be ignored. It is
Ramadan and I hope for your answer.
If someone is not a qadiani but knows that they believe in
a false prophet and accepts qadianis as a madhab in Islam,
are they out of Islam? I believe that they are out of
Islam, and I am acting on that belief in my conduct towards
such people.
Answer:
Praise be to Allah.
Definition:
Qadianism is a movement that started in 1900 CE as a plot
by the British colonialists in the Indian subcontinent,
with the aim of diverting Muslims away from their religion
and from the obligation of jihad in particular, so that
they would not oppose colonialism in the name of Islam. The
mouthpiece of this movement was the magazine Majallat
Al-Adyaan (Magazine if Religions) which was published in
English.
Foundation and prominent personalities:
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani (1839-1908 CE) was the main
tool by means of which Qadianiyyah was founded. He was born
in the village of Qadian, in the Punjab, in India, in 1839
CE. He came from a family that was well known for having
betrayed its religion and country, so Ghulam Ahmad grew up
loyal and obedient to the colonialists in every sense. Thus
he was chosen for the role of a so-called prophet, so that
the Muslims would gather around him and he would distract
them from waging jihaad against the English colonialists.
The British government did lots of favours for them, so
they were loyal to the British. Ghulam Ahmad was known
among his followers to be unstable, with a lot of health
problems and dependent on drugs.
Among those who confronted him and his evil dawah was
Shaykh Abul-Wafa Thana al-Amritsari, the leader of
Jamaiyyat Ahl al-Hadeeth fi Umoom al-Hind (The All-India
Society of Ahl al-Hadeeth). The Shaykh debated with him and
refuted his arguments, revealing his ulterior motives and
Kufr and the deviation of his way. When Ghulam Ahmad did
not come to his senses, Shaykh Abul-Wafa challenged him
to come together and invoke the curse of Allaah, such that
the one who was lying would die in the lifetime of the one
who was telling the truth. Only a few days passed before
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani died, in 1908 CE, leaving
behind more than fifty books, pamphlets and articles, among
the most important of which are: Izaalat al-Awhaam
(Dispelling illusions), Ijaaz Ahmadi (Ahmadi miracles),
Baraaheen Ahmadiyyah (Ahmadi proofs), Anwaar al-Islam
(Lights of Islam), Ijaaz al-Maseeh (Miracles of the
Messiah), al-Tableegh (Conveying (the message))and
Tajalliyyaat Ilaahiyyah (Divine manifestations).
Noor al-Deen (Nuruddin): the first Khaleefah of the
Qadianis. The British put the crown of Khilaafah on his
head, so the disciples (of Ghulam Ahmad) followed him.
Among his books is: Fasl al-Khitaab (Definitive statement).
Muhammad Ali and Khojah Kamaal al-Deen: the two leaders of
the Lahore Qadianis. They are the ones who gave the final
shape to the movement. The former produced a distorted
translation into English of the Quraan. His other works
include: Haqeeqat al-Ikhtilaaf (The reality of
differences), al-Nubuwwah fil-Islam (Prophethood in Islam)
and al-Deen al-Islami (The Islamic religion). As for Khojah
Kamaal al-Deen, he wrote a book called al-Mathal al-Alaa
fil-Anbiya (The highest example of the Prophets), and
other books. This Lahore group of Ahmadis are those who
think of Ghulam Ahmad as a Mujaddid (renewer or reviver of
Islam) only, but both groups are viewed as a single
movement because odd ideas that are not seen in the one
will surely be found in the other.
Muhammad Ali: the leader of the Lahore Qadianis. He was one
of those who gave the final shape to Qadianiyyah, a
colonialist spy and the person in charge of the magazine
which was the voice of the Qadianiyyah. He also produced a
distorted translation into English of the Quraan. Among
his works are Haqeeqat al-Ikhtilaaf (The reality of
differences), and al-Nubuwwah fil-Islam (Prophethood in
Islam), as stated above.
Muhammad Saadiq, the mufti of the Qadianiyyah. His works
include: Khatim al-Nabiyyeen The seal of the Prophets).
Basheer Ahmad ibn Ghulam. His works include: Seerat
al-Mahdi (the life of the Mahdi) and Kalimat al-Fasl
(Decisive word).
Mahmood Ahmad ibn Ghulam, his second Khaleefah. Among his
works are: Anwaar al-Khilaafah (Lights of the caliphate),
Tuhfat al-Mulook and Haqeeqat al-Nubuwwah (The reality of
prophethood).
The appointment of the Qadiani Zafar-Allaah Khan as the
first Foreign Minister of Pakistan had a major effect in
supporting this deviant sect, as he gave them a large area
in the province of the Punjab to be their world
headquarters, which they named Rabwah (high ground) as in
the aayah (interpretation of the meaning): "And We gave
them refuge on high ground (rabwah), a place of rest,
security and flowing streams." [al-Muminoon 23:50].
Their thought and beliefs
Ghulam Ahmad began his activities as an Islamic daaiyah
(caller to Islam) so that he could gather followers around
him, then he claimed to be a mujaddid inspired by Allaah.
Then he took a further step and claimed to be the Awaited
Mahdi and the Promised Messiah. Then he claimed to be a
Prophet and that his prophethood was higher than that of
Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
*
The Qadianis believe that Allaah fasts, prays,
sleeps, wakes up, writes, makes mistakes and has
intercourse - exalted be Allaah far above all that they
say.
*
The Qadiani believes that his god is English because
he speaks to him in English.
*
The Qadianis believe that Prophethood did not end
with Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him),
but that it is ongoing, and that Allaah sends a messenger
when there is a need, and that Ghulam Ahmad is the best of
all the Prophets.
*
They believe that Jibreel used to come down to Ghulam
Ahmad and that he used to bring revelation to him, and that
his inspirations are like the Quraan.
*
They say that there is no Quraan other than what the
"Promised Messiah" (Ghulam Ahmad) brought, and no hadeeth
except what is in accordance with his teachings, and no
Prophet except under the leadership of Ghulam Ahmad.
*
They believe that their book was revealed. Its name
is al-Kitaab al-Mubeen and it is different from the Holy
Quraan.
*
They believe that they are followers of a new and
independent religion and an independent Shareeah, and that
the friends of Ghulam are like the Sahaabah.
*
They believe that Qadian is like Madeenah and Makkah,
if not better than them, and that its land is sacred. It is
their Qiblah and the place they make hajj to.
*
They called for the abolition of jihaad and blind
obedience to the British government because, as they
claimed, the British were "those in authority" as stated in
the Quraan.
*
In their view every Muslim is a Kaafir unless he
becomes a Qadiani, and everyone who married a non-Qadiani
is also a kaafir.
*
They allow alcohol, opium, drugs and intoxicants.
Intellectual and ideological roots:
The westernizing movement of Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan paved
the way for the emergence of the Qadianiyyah, because it
had already spread deviant ideas.
The British made the most of this opportunity so they
started the Qadiani movement and chose a man from a family
that had a history of being agents of the colonialists.
In 1953 CE, there was a popular revolution in Pakistan
which demanded the removal of Zafar-Allaah Khan from the
position of Foreign Minister and that the Qadiani sect
should be regarded as a non-Muslim minority. In this
uprising around ten thousand Muslims were martyred, and
they succeeded in having the Qadiani minister removed from
office.
In Rabee al-Awwal 1394 AH (April 1974), a major conference
was held by the Muslim World League in Makkah, which was
attended by representatives of Muslim organizations from
around the world. This conference announced that this sect
is Kaafir and is beyond the pale of Islam, and told Muslims
to resist its dangers and not to cooperate with the
Qadianis or bury their dead in Muslim graveyards.
The Majlis al-Ummah in Pakistan (the central parliament)
debated with the Qadiani leader Mirza Naasir Ahmad, and he
was refuted by Shaykh Mufti Mahmood (may Allaah have mercy
on him). The debate went on for nearly thirty hours but
Naasir Ahmad was unable to give answers and the Kufr of
this group was exposed, so the Majlis issued a statement
that the Qadianis should be regarded as a non-Muslim
minority.
Among the factors that make Mirza Ghulam Ahmad an obvious
Kaafir are the following:
*
His claim to be a Prophet
*
His abolition of the duty of jihaad, to serve the
interests of the colonialists.
*
His saying that people should no longer go on Hajj to
Makkah, and his substitution of Qadian as the place of
pilgrimage.
*
His anthropomorphism or likening Allaah to human
beings.
*
His belief in the transmigration of souls and
incarnation.
*
His attributing a son to Allaah and his claim to be
the son of God.
*
His denying that Prophethood ended with Muhammad
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his
regarding the door of Prophethood to be open to "any Tom,
Dick or Harry".
The Qadianis have strong ties with Israel. Israel has
opened centres and schools for them, and helped them to
publish a magazine which is their mouthpiece, to print
books and publications for distribution worldwide.
The fact that they are influenced by Judaism, Christianity
and al-Baatiniyyah is clear from their beliefs and
practices, even though they claim to be Muslims.
Their spread and positions of influence
Most of the Qadianis nowadays live in India and Pakistan,
with a few in Israel and the Arab world. They are trying,
with the help of the colonialists, to obtain sensitive
positions in all the places where they live.
The Qadianis are very active in Africa and in some western
countries. In Africa they have more than 5,000 teachers and
daiyahs working full-time to call people to Qadianiyyah.
Their wide-spread activity proves that they have the
support of the colonialists.
The British government is also supporting this movement and
making it easy for their followers to get positions in
world governments, corporate administration and consulates.
Some of them are also high-ranking officers in the secret
services.
In calling people to their beliefs, the Qadianis use all
kinds of methods, especially educational means, because
they are highly-educated and there are many scientists,
engineers and doctors in their ranks. In Britain there is a
satellite TV channel called Islamic TV which is run by the
Qadianis.
>From the above, it is clear that:
Qadianiyyah is a misguided group, which is not part of
Islam at all. Its beliefs are completely contradictory to
Islam, so Muslims should beware of their activities, since
the Ulama (scholars) of Islam have stated that they are
Kaafirs.
For more information see: Al-Qadianiyyah by Ihsaan Ilaahi
Zaheer.
(Translators note: this book is available in English under
the title "Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey" by Ehsan Elahi
Zaheer)
Reference: Al-Mawsooah al-Muyassarah fil-Adyaan
al-Madhaahib wal-Ahzaab al-Muaasirah by Dr. Maani Hammad
al-Juhani, 1/419-423
The following statement was published by the Islamic Fiqh
Council (Majma al-Fiqh al-Islami):
After discussing the question put to the Islamic Fiqh
Council in Capetown, South Africa, concerning the ruling on
the Qadianis and their off-shoot which is known as
Lahoriyyah, and whether they should be counted as Muslims
or not, and whether a non-Muslim is qualified to examine an
issue of this nature:
In the light of research and documents presented to the
members of the council concerning Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
al-Qadiani, who emerged in India in the last century and to
whom is attributed the Qadiani and Lahori movements, and
after pondering the information presented on these two
groups, and after confirming that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
claimed to be a prophet who received revelation, a claim
which is documented in his own writings and speeches, some
of which he claimed to have received as revelation, a claim
which he propagated all his life and asked people to
believe in, just as it is also well-known that he denied
many other things which are proven to be essential elements
of the religion of Islam
In the light of the above, the Council issued the following
statement:
Firstly: the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a prophet
or a messenger and to receive revelation are clearly a
rejection of proven and essential elements of Islam, which
unequivocally states that Prophethood ended with Muhammad
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and that no
revelation will come to anyone after him. This claim made
by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad makes him and anyone who agrees with
him an apostate who is beyond the pale of Islam. As for the
Lahoriyyah, they are like the Qadianiyyah: the same ruling
of apostasy applies to them despite the fact that they
described Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a shadow and manifestation
of our Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him).
Secondly: it is not appropriate for a non-Muslim court or
judge to give a ruling on who is a Muslim and who is an
apostate, especially when this goes against the consensus
of the scholars and organizations of the Muslim Ummah.
Rulings of this nature are not acceptable unless they are
issued by a Muslim scholar who knows all the requirements
for being considered a Muslim, who knows when a person may
be deemed to have overstepped the mark and become an
apostate, who understands the realities of Islam and kufr,
and who has comprehensive knowledge of what is stated in
the Quraan, Sunnah and scholarly consensus. The ruling of
a court of that nature is invalid. And Allaah knows best.
Majma al-Fiqh al-Islami, p. 13
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
Question:
I understand that it is alright for a Muslim male to marry
a woman from the people of the book. But how about if a
Muslim male wants to marry a Qadiani girl, who's of a good
character and personality?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Given that the Qadiani school of thought is a form of major
Kufr (disbelief) which puts them beyond the pale of Islam,
it is not permissible to marry this woman, because Allaah
says (interpretation of the meaning):
"They are not lawful (wives) for the disbelievers nor are
the disbelievers lawful (husbands) for them" [al-Mumtahinah
60:10]
And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
Question:
Assalaamu 'Alaikum,
I attended a funeral today for my wife's aunt. After the
janazah prayer, I found out that the person performing the
janazah prayer was not muslim. He was an Ahmadi belonging
to the sect who says Mirza Gulam was a prophet. I
personally feel that the janazah was not valid, but there
were a lot of muslims in the congregation, who paid little
attention to the fact that the leader was not muslim.
Should my family and I re-pray the janazah?
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Yes, you have to repeat the funeral prayer, because this
imaam behind whom you prayed is a believer in a kaafir
doctrine which puts him beyond the pale of Islam. We ask
Allaah to show mercy to your deceased loved one..
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
Fatwa of Sheikh Ahmed Kutty, Canada
Question:
My question is about Shi`a and Qadianiyyah. They dont
believe in some pillar of Islam. Are they Muslims?
Answer:
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and
blessings be upon His Messenger.
As far as the moderate Shi`ah like Ithna Ashriya or
Imamiyyah are concerned, generally they have been accepted
as Muslims by the Ijma (juristic unanimity) of the Muslim
community and that is why they have been permitted to go
for hajj while it a recognized fact that non-Muslims are
not allowed to perform hajj.
This Ijma of the community does not apply to people who
have violated the fundamental principles of Islam, such as
those who prophesied the divinity of Ali, may Allah be
pleased with him, or denied the fact that prophethood has
ended with Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon
him.
As for Qadianis, they have violated these principles when
they claimed that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is a prophet. Due to
this violation, they cannot be called Muslims and this has
also been established by the Ijma (concensus) of Muslims.
Fatwa of Islamic community of Bosniaks in the U.S.
10 June, 1997
Assalamu Aleikum:
Destroyers of Islam from Bosnia-Herzegovina in the U.S.
Our Bosnia-Herzegovina Muslims, after enduring suffering
and harsh circumstances, are now dealing with this equally
harmful cult called "Qadianiyyat", or better known in the
West as "Ahmadiyyat". This cult is falsely presenting
itself to our fellow Muslims as brothers who want to help
them. However, they are only interested in increasing the
membership of their cult, and as a matter of fact they
began as a cult with a hatred for Islam, and especially
toward the Prophet Muhammad(SAW). They wish to weaken Islam
and destroy it from the inside.
As a legitimate leader of Islam in the U.S., I feel
obligated to open the eyes of our people and warn them away
from Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the false self-proclaimed prophet,
who has been denounced by Muslim scholars as having gone
against the religion.
"Whoever wishes to have another religion besides Islam will
not be accepted by Allah, the beneficent the Merciful, and
he will be of those whom are doomed." [The Holy Quran]
Any Muslim man or woman who joins the "Ahmadiyya Cult" will
cease to be Muslims and will be subject to the following
conditions:
He cannot be given the Islamic funeral rites, nor can he be
buried in an Islamic cemetery;
No Muslim man or woman is allowed to marry a person from
this cult;
Meat that is slaughtered by someone in this sect is
considered "haram" and, therefore, is prohibited from being
consumed by Muslims;
Visiting any of their places of worship, which they falsely
call mosques, is strictly prohibited.
Sadly, there have been quite a few Bosnians who have been
recruited by the Ahmadiyya and who are now fallen Muslims
and are traitors to our Muslim identity by working for them
to recruit more innocent Muslims. Some have been promised
apartments and a good wage if they are able to recruit more
of our mujahedins. Because of this, my brothers and
sisters, beware and do not allow any one to lead you
astray. All of your religious needs may be met by visiting
us at the address above or by calling our number.
By the word of your highest religious leader,
Senad Agic, Head Imam
Fatwa of Mullah Bashir Rahim
Question:
Please give me explanation about Ahmadiyah movement.
Are they right or wrong or possibly right or possibly
wrong? And why?
Answer:
The Ahmadiya sect was founded in Qadian, Punjab in 1889 by
one Mirza Gulam Ahmad.
He claimed not only that he was a Mahdi but also a
re-incarnation of Krishna and that he was the Prophet of
Islam in succession to the Holy Prophet. Some say that he
claimed to be the reappearance (burooz) of the Holy
Prophet. On the death of Mirza Gulam in 1908 the Ahmadiya
community elected Moulvi Nuru-Deen to be the khalifah. When
Nuru-Deen died in 1914 the majority of the community
continued to believe that Mirza Gulam was a prophet in
succession to the Holy Prophet. There was a minority
splinter group in Lahore which declared that Mirza Gulam
was a reformer (mujaddid).
As the Ahmadiyas believe that Mirza Gulam was a prophet
they cannot be accepted within the fold of Islam. The
Muslims, the sunnis as well as the shiahs, universally
believe that Muhammad (SAWA) was the last of the prophets
of Allah (SWT) as attested by the Holy Qur'an, Chapter 33,
Verse 40 where Allah says,
"Muhammad............is the messenger of Allah and the last
of the prophets".
The expression used literally means the seal of the Prophet
"khataman nabiyyin" but there can be absolutely no doubt
that even in the context of a seal it has a definite
finality.
There are many ahadeeth of the Holy Prophet which leave no
doubt that there would be no prophet after him. He is
reported as having said : "Bani Israeel had prophets who
were leading them. When one died another would succeeded
him. But after me there will be no prophet. I am khatiman
nabiyyin."
There can be no doubt that as far as the belief of the
Ahmadiyas is concerned it is not only un-Islamic but
contrary to the Holy Book.
Bashir Rahim
Question:
Are Lahori Ahmadis kafirs even though they reject the
belief that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a prophet?
If Lahori Ahmadis are not Muslims, please explain how this
is so, since they deny neither the Khatm an-Nabiyeen nor
Allah's Tawheed.
Answer:
To accept as a leader religious, a person who claimed to be
a prophet in succession to the Holy Prophet (SAWA) would
place one in the same category as a person who accepts his
claim to be true.
The splinter group of the Lahori Ahmadiyyas cannot be
distinguished from the juridical point of view from the
group which accepts Mirza Gulam Ahmad's claim to
prophethood. Had they chosen another leader, and had they
openly denounced Mirza Gulam Ahmad as someone who had
falsely claimed prophethood, it would have been a different
case. In that case they would not have called themselves
Ahmadiyyas.
Bashir Rahim
Article taken (with Thanks) from Idara Dawat-O-Irshad
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zuls
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ahmadiyah,siapo nan bisa manjalehkan sacaro
tuntas???
Assalmu'alaikum warahmatullahi wa barakatuh,
Sanak Ridha tolong ambo dikirim ciek tentang Ahmadiyah via japri sajo.
Syukran katsir
Wassalam
ZS Mangkuto
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ahmad Ridha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ahmadiyah, siapo nan bisa manjalehkan sacaro
tuntas???
> Mulyadi wrote:
Website http://www.rantaunet.org
_____________________________________________________
Berhenti/mengganti konfigurasi keanggotaan anda, silahkan ke:
http://rantaunet.org/palanta-setting
------------------------------------------------------------
Tata Tertib Palanta RantauNet:
http://rantaunet.org/palanta-tatatertib
____________________________________________________
