First, no conscience consumer is going to pay $360 for CodeWarrior.
They are going to pay $271 + S & H at www.buycomp.com or even less at
some auction house.

Second, hand a novice user a copy of CW and a copy of gcc.  The novice
will be able to install the environment, create a project, compile it,
install it on a device, and run it in about 30 minutes.  I know because
I was a novice to the Palm when I did just what I described.  Just try
doing that with gcc.  I tried to do the same with gcc and spent a few
hours getting everything installed and usable.  Now granted, I may just
be a putz who was slow to figure out gcc, but the fact remains that I
was more productive with CW.

I really hate testimonials though because they are usually factless
and/or subjective.  I will refer you to an objective HandHeld systems
magazine article that compares the two at
http://www.wademan.com/Pilot/Program/GCCvsCW.htm.  Watch for breaks in
the URL.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Davis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 1999 9:44 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: gcc vs anything else
> 
> On 7 Apr 1999, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> 
> > "Michael S. Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Just one comment.  I use GCC and I was wondering; is there
> anything,
> > > noteworthy, that you can do with CW that cannot be done with GCC?
> > 
> >     No one else seems to pick up on this, so I'll continue to beat
> > my horse into the ground: having a visual UI builder (MW
> Constructor)
> > has some massive advantages over a text-compilation based one
> > (PilRC). If I actually had a system that MW ran on, I'd buy it
> > immediately, as the $360 would be very quickly recouped in UI
> > development time.
> 
> But there are very good UI builders for $20, like PilotMag (and there
> are
> others).  I use it and it's great, simple and does anything I need as
> far
> as UI building.  Can't see paying $360 for something that you can get
> for
> free+$20.  
> 
> > 
> >     - Nathan
> > 
> > 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Shoot-to-Win
> 
> Protect the 2nd Amendment
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 

Reply via email to