Chris,

I should clarify that.
I think that what I said is true, if you know my assumptions.
I'm assuming that a calling form may call any of n forms to
perform various work.

Now suppose my calling form gets the update-event.
It knows only that 1 of n popup forms has returned.

Therefore I need to inform the calling form somehow
as to which popup form has just returned.

I do this by including a special code as an argument to
FrmUpdateForm, which is then passed as an argument for
the update-event sent to the calling form.

This clears up, I think, the "corrections" which you ahve made to 
my statement.

To be really strict, nothing in life is really _necessary_.
Things can only be conditionally necessary.
That is, one must always ask "necessary for what?".
And in this case, I claim that the reason for passing the
identity of the called popup-form in the update-event is
necessary for discriminating between multiple possible called
popup forms.
Of course, you can also leave this info lying around
in a pre-agreed global variable.
But then you can pass _all_ function parameters in this way.
(It's gets more tricky for recursive function calls though.)

Cheers from chilly Adelaide,
Alan Kennington.

Reply via email to