> Aaron Ardiri wrote:
> > there was some 'advance' notice? nice to know you got some!
> 
> No, I meant the usual notice for everybody -- none.  :-)

  :_) i figured that out on the news groups too..
 
> > looks like 3.0 rom
> 
> Actually the chart says 3.1, which would be a whole new ROM if it's
> running on the non-EZ chip.  But it's not clear if it really comes with
> the 3.1.1 patch built in that fixes those screen problems.

  interesting.. that 'streaking' was a big fix with 3.1.1
 
> > the 'field' Flash ROM states "N/A", where others say they
> > can have software upgrades (OS).
> 
> You're right, I missed that in the lower chart.  If correct, this would
> be extremely disappointing.  With an OS upgrade right around the corner
> and this new unit locked into the older version, it would make this unit
> hard to recommend (if I was in the position to recommend which models
> for a customer to buy, but I'm not in that position).

  its like telling a customer to by one of these 'proprietory'
  computer systems.. they cannot do anything but use it.. if there
  is a bug, bad luck.. you cannot upgrade.

  i *would* not recommend the Palm IIIe to anyone.. but remember,
  you get the enhanced screen and it is cheaper! :>

  ... maybe companies will like this?

az.
--
Aaron Ardiri 
Lecturer                       http://www.hig.se/~ardiri/
University-College i G�vle     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SE 801 76 G�vle SWEDEN       
Tel: +46 26 64 87 38           Fax: +46 26 64 87 88
Mob: +46 70 352 8192           A/H: +46 26 10 16 11

Reply via email to