Richard Hartman wrote:
> Even a simple XOR could be made more complex,
> for example, you don't have to XOR -every- byte
> in the program ... just XOR a few bytes here
> and there until about 30% of them have been
> altered. That would be much harder to figure
> out than a 100% XORing scheme.
>
There is a similar scheme for some old DOS software that decompressed itself
upon execution. As I remeber, it worked pretty well.
>
> --
> -Richard M. Hartman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
If you break a physical law, do physicists arrest and sentence you to being
an underpaid lab assistant?
